‘It’s heartbreaking’: how 30 captive white whales are now tools in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an charming small “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.
Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.
But those closest to the whales say the heated discussion over their destiny often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the people who work with them regularly.
After the Canadian government prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are housed warned to euthanize them unless the federal government funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious situation.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Scientists say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something a former trainer observed first-hand.
She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that entailed gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.
“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless surprised by the nuances and unique traits in their personalities. She developed a deep bond for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.
“Eve selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each altered the way I perceive bonding.”
Growing Opposition and Facility Decline
Her interaction with the whales progressed against a context of growing public opposition to their captivity.
During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, died. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility attributes to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.
The facility did not operate to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the closure. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far superior health care and constant care than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”
Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was dismissed from the park in the spring following the demise of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were shared to the press and she was fired not long after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any attempts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and machinery.
“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs calls for the whales to be removed promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.
In recent months, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a request to export the whales to China.
“Allowing the proposal would have meant a ongoing existence in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister commented. “As the public, we know that marine mammals belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience approve an export that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have endured.”
But Burgess said the official’s remarks reflect a wider misunderstanding of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas born in captivity.
“The people needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”
Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion
As officials struggle to find a answer, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of sustenance for local populations.
A planned refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be highly debated. The prospective location, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain hopeful that it could in time represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ future.
Different voices say the prospect of a protected habitat represents a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the near future.
Charles Vinick, head of the plan, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|