🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.